Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus introduced legislation to the lower house on Wednesday to set up the integrity commission, which will cost $262 million over four years and $90 million more than an earlier coalition proposal.

He said the body - to be known as the National Anti-Corruption Commission - would operate independently of the government and have powers to investigate serious or systemic corrupt conduct across the commonwealth public sector.

Ministers, parliamentarians, staff, statutory office holders, government employees and contractors will be eligible for investigation by the commission.

Protections for whistleblowers and journalists as well as safeguards to protect reputations are also included in the proposal.

Mr Dreyfus said the commission would be the lead commonwealth agency to investigate serious or systemic corruption and would work in partnership with other agencies such as the federal police.

"The commission will have a full suite of powers similar to those of a royal commission (and) it will be able to use its powers to undertake an investigation into a corruption issue," he said.

"It will have the power to hold public hearings (and) it will also have a mandate to prevent corruption and educate Australians about corruption."

But although public hearings will be held in "exceptional circumstances", Mr Dreyfus said the default position for the commission would be for private hearings.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said the coalition would support processes where people engaging in corrupt behaviour were held to account.

However, the coalition had yet to decide on a final position on the bill.

Mr Dutton said he wanted the legislation to go through normal processes, but indicated it was important to strike the right balance with the laws.

"I support the government in the model they put forward ... I am in favour instinctively of an integrity commission but I want to have that balance," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday.

"I don't want innocent people being trashed and I don't want reputations being trashed."

Mr Dutton said he was concerned by the motivations of some of the Greens and crossbench independents surrounding concerns with the integrity commission.

"There are some within the Greens and some independents who want to see ... the system pulled down," he said.

"I want there to be safety and checks and balances in place because this is something that will survive for generations."

Greens senator David Shoebridge said the government's proposed test for public hearings was "exceptionally unhelpful".

"One of the best disinfectants for corruption is sunshine," he told reporters in Canberra.

"Public hearings are critical to the work of this national anti-corruption commission."

Independent MP Helen Haines, who has been a staunch advocate for the commission, said the proposal was the culmination of years of work that would continue.

"There is going to be an inquiry, we'll be in there doing our best to make sure that this anti-corruption commission is the very best it can be," she said.

"This is a once in a generation opportunity, we plan to get it right."

Independent Sydney MP Zali Steggall said the legal test imposed for public hearings was a "red flag" because it meant they might be "rare".

Ms Steggall said previous claims made by the coalition that public hearings were "show trials" were a "shameful attack" on the important work done by anti-corruption commissions.

She said the NSW model which involved public hearings demonstrated a "greater level of transparency and scrutiny" than other state bodies.

Australian Associated Press